Tuesday, May 6, 2014

EDITORIAL - Martin should apologize to the nation

Maybe it is too much to ask that Filipino singer Martin Nievera be imprisoned for his atrocious rendition of the national anthem during the opening ceremonies of the fight between Manny Pacquiao and Ricky Hatton in Las Vegas last May 2.

But at the very best he should be summoned and admonished and told in no uncertain terms, so that other singers will be forewarned, that artistic license does not extend to the national anthem, meaning no one but no one is allowed to take liberties with its singing.

Republic Act 8491 or the Flag and Heraldic Code of the Philippines it will be mandatory for students to memorize the anthem at schools and provides that “the rendition of the National Anthem, whether played or sung, shall be in accordance with the musical arrangement and composition of Julian Felipe.”

Felipe is the original music arranger of Lupang Hinirang in 1898. It has tune of march and the lyrics was adapted from the Spanish poem “Filipinas” written by Jose Palma only in 1899.

When the national anthem is played, the public is required to sing and do so "with fervor."

They are expected to sing while the right palm is placed over the left chest. Uniformed personnel, meanwhile, are to salute the flag as prescribed by their respective regulations.

Individuals whose faith prohibit them from singing “Lupang Hinirang” must still show full respect.

The national anthem, however, would not be allowed to be played preceding “events of recreation, amusement, or entertainment purposes.”

But the anthem may be played during the following: international competitions where the Philippines is the host or has a representative, national or local sports competitions, during the “signing on” or “signing off” of radio and television broadcasting stations, before the opening and after the closing of work in government and private offices, before the initial and last screening of films and before the opening of theater performances; Provided, that the owners and management of the establishments shall be mandated to enforce proper decorum and implement the pertinent provisions of this act; and other occasions as may be allowed by the NHI.

The Oath of Patriotism (Panatang Makabayan) must be recited after the singing of the national anthem in basic education institutions. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Philippine Flag (Panunumpa ng Katapatan sa Watawat ng Pilipinas) may be recited as well, though the law did not specify who is required to do so.

Section 20 of the law also states: “The observance of the flag ceremony in official or civic gatherings shall be simple and dignified and shall include the playing or singing of the anthem in its original Filipino lyrics and march tempo.”

The NHI may prescribe in the implementing rules and regulations of this act other acts or omissions which shall be deemed disrespectful, and thus prohibited, relative to the flag, national anthem, great seal, coat-of-arms, national motto and other heraldic items and devices.

Any citizen shall have the power to conduct a citizen's arrest if a person is actually violating of any provision of this act in officers to assist in conducting citizen's arrest. All security personnel and ushers in movie-houses are likewise authorized to arrest the violators.

But it it not just the law that is against the kind of singing that Martin Nievera did. There is also the matter of good taste and good sense. Anyone who heard Martin, and that means presumably the entire country, clearly did not like what they heard.

A national anthem symbolizes a country. That is precisely the reason why during very important international events such as the Pacquiao-Hatton fight, the national anthems of the home countries of the participants are always played.

Now what a sordid situation we would be putting ourselves in when the national anthem of the Philippines, the sacred hymn representing all 90 million of us Filipinos, is left to the whims and caprices of a single singer.

On whose authority did Martin Nievera decide to do what he did? Who gave him the permission to mangle one of the very first songs that all Filipino children are taught and told to memorize and learn by heart for the rest of their lives?

If Martin Nievera has little respect for his personal obligations, such as marriage, he should be told that respect for the national anthem carries with it a far more compelling and enduring obligation that does not get obliterated even in the changing moods of the times.

Or if Martin Nievera was trying to show the international audience the kind of artistic prowess he possesses, perhaps to lure them into watching his occasional shows in the US, let it not be at the expense of the national anthem.

No comments:

Post a Comment