Wednesday, August 19, 2020

List of Multiply-compatible devices

Platforms

The devices featured in this list feature hardware that is compatible for using Multiply.


  • Amazon Fire TV, Kindle Fire, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle Fire HDX
  • Android smartphones and tablets
  • Android TV devices
  • Apple: Apple TV, iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch
  • Barnes & Noble Nook Color, Nook Tablet, Nook HD
  • D-Link Boxee Box
  • Fetch TV includes both Fetch Mighty, and Fetch Mini
  • Google Chromecast
  • Google TV devices
  • Insignia Blu-ray Disc players and home theater systems
  • LG Electronics: some Blu-ray Disc players, TVs, and home theater systems
  • Microsoft: Windows 10, Windows 8, Windows Phone, Xbox 360, Xbox One[26]
  • Nintendo: Nintendo 3DS and Wii U
  • Panasonic: some Blu-ray Disc players, televisions and home theater systems
  • Philips: some Blu-ray Disc players and TVs
  • Roku streaming player
  • Samsung: some Blu-ray Disc players, home theater systems, smartphones, TVs, and tablets
  • Seagate FreeAgent Theater+ HD media player
  • Sharp: some LED/LCD TVs and Blu-ray Disc players
  • Sony Blu-ray Disc players, televisions, PlayStation 3, PlayStation Vita and PlayStation 4
  • TiVo DVRs (HD, HD XL, Series3, Premiere, Premiere XL, Roamio, and Bolt boxes)
  • Viewsonic VMP75
  • Vizio: some Blu-ray Disc players and TVs
  • Western Digital WD Live Plus media player
  • Yamaha BD-A1020
  • YouView set-top boxes in the UK

Multiply makes a comeback with app launch


 

Multiply is making a comeback as a photo and video site, more than seven years after it went close down last May 6, 2013 and ceasing all business operations on May 31, 2013.


The company, PT Multiply Indonesia has launched a app for smartphones, smart TVs, tablets and digital media players, is planning to roll out archive photo and video services.

There will be photos and videos from the old Multiply accounts from 2004 to 2013, Webshots accounts from 1999 to 2012, Friendster accounts from 2002 to 2011 and Fotolog accounts from 2002 to 2015.

Multiply is looking to embrace the “digital mom”. Recognizing that many of the site’s members are adults looking to share their media with loved ones, the site has adopted an interface that is best described as a media inbox. When you first log in, the site presents you with a stream of content similar to Facebook’s news feed. Your friends’ newest events, messages, and photo albums appear in the main column, with thumbnails next to each.

Navigation through the new interface largely revolves around a new sidebar at the left hand side of the screen, which strongly resembles something you might see in an Email client. The panel includes links to your most important friends and family, allowing you to make sure you catch all of their latest updates. Likewise, there are filters for the site’s groups, and you can create powerful custom filters – a feature that will appeal to power users.


Aside from this feed of new items, the other main area to get an overhaul in Multiply is the Media Locker, where you can upload and manage all of your photos, videos, and blog posts. This is where the new site really shines – Multiply’s photo manager strongly resembles native photo software like iPhoto, allowing you to drag and drop photos into whatever albums you’d like. You can use a slider to adjust how large the thumbnails appear during navigation, and the top bar includes handy links that let you quickly share albums via Email or through Multiply itself. It’s also much easier to export photos to the site’s printing storefront, which allows you to have your images printed into physical photo books, cups, and other products.

The Media Locker also includes a number of basic photo editing features, like red-eye reduction, color adjustment, and image cropping. Multiply isn’t the first social network to offer these features (MySpace launched similar tools earlier this year), but unlike the MySpace editor Multiply’s doesn’t need a Flash embed. To get your photos onto Multiply, the site offers a range of plugins for your computer’s photo software, as well as an AIR application that can monitor your folders for any new images as they are imported from your camera.


My one major gripe with the new site is the inconsistent appearance of the sidebar. While it appears and changes contextually when you’re in the Inbox or Media Locker sections, any time you visit a page or album on a friend’s profile, the sidebar vanishes. You can still get back to the other pages using the links at the top of the screen, but it’s strange for a UI element that seems persistent to disappear occasionally (imagine if Facebook’s menubar at the bottom of its pages only showed up some of the time).

Aside from that, Multiply’s site seems solid, offering a social network that can really do your media justice. Facebook may be the web’s leading photo sharing service, and it’s great for sharing day to day photos with friends. But for those shots that really matter you can’t beat full resolution, which Facebook doesn’t offer. Multiply allows users to upload full resolution photos, with the option of paying $20/year for an unlimited amount of storage to to have them all backed up. Multiply isn’t going to overtake Facebook any time soon, but it’s doing a great job bridging the gap between photo sharing services like Flickr and the larger social networks.

Kape't Pandasal - Tao Pa Rin

Enron and the 24 Other Most Epic Corporate Downfalls of All Time

When energy-trading company Enron declared bankruptcy in 2001, it was the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history. The company’s demise was tinged with scandal, as it was revealed that Enron execs were pocketing millions while knowingly overstating the company’s earnings to shareholders through fraudulent accounting.


Although Enron became the poster child for corporate scandal, it’s far from the only major company to fall from grace. These 25 other corporations were once at the top of their games — worth millions and even billions of dollars — but crashed and burned due to crooked execs, poor management, changing times or a combination of the above. Take a look at how these companies lost it all.


Standard Oil


No list of corporate downfalls is complete without a mention of Standard Oil, which was the most dominant oil company in the world from 1870 to 1911, according to NBC News. Although the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was passed in 1890, it wasn’t until 1911 that the Supreme Court found Standard Oil guilty of violating the Act through its practice of using low prices to eliminate its competitors. As a result of the Supreme Court ruling, Standard Oil was broken up into separate companies that are now known as Chevron, Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips.


Blockbuster


There was a time when Blockbuster was everyone’s go-to place for movie rentals, but Netflix changed all that. Although Blockbuster initially dismissed Netflix’s looming threat, execs at the rental company soon wised up and took steps to compete. Blockbuster discontinued late fees, invested in an online platform and created a Total Access program that let customers rent videos online and return them in stores. The program was successful, but investors didn’t like how expensive it was to operate, and franchisees thought it could threaten their businesses. In 2007, then-CEO John Antioco was fired after a salary dispute. His replacement, Jim Keyes, reversed the company’s online strategy to focus on retail. Three years later, Blockbuster went bankrupt.


Allied Crude Vegetable Oil Refining Corporation


Commodities trader Anthony De Angelis was the mastermind behind what came to be known as the salad oil scandal. In the 1960s, De Angelis’ Allied Crude Vegetable Oil Company took out bank loans secured by his inventory of soybean oil. However, he filled his containers with mostly water and claimed that he had $175 million worth of salad oil that didn’t actually exist. A whistleblower tipped the scheme to American Express, which was one of the company’s biggest loan providers. Shortly after, in 1963, Allied Crude Vegetable Oil Company filed for bankruptcy.


Borders


Borders was the second-largest bookstore chain when it announced that it would be liquidating its assets in 2011. Borders initially thrived thanks to its giant stores that could hold more inventory than smaller bookstores and its superior inventory system, but sales began to decline in the mid-1990s. The company invested big in CDs and DVDs at a time when the music and movie industries were largely going digital. Another mistake was outsourcing its online sales to Amazon and focusing on refurbishing its physical stores. By 2007, Borders was no longer turning a profit, NPR reported. Four years later it filed for bankruptcy.


Texaco


In the 1980s, oil giant Texaco got hit with a giant civil lawsuit by Pennzoil for interfering in the latter company’s imminent acquisition of the Getty Oil Company. The court ruled that Pennzoil was owed punitive damages of $10.5 billion (though Texaco ended up paying only $3 billion). In 1987, Texaco filed for bankruptcy protection. Roughly a year later, the company was acquired by Chevron.


DeLorean Motor Company


Thanks to “Back to the Future,” the DeLorean is forever ingrained in pop culture — but the car manufacturer itself ended quite abruptly. John Z. DeLorean left General Motors in the late ’70s to create a new American sports car, backed by $200 million in investment funds. In 1981, production began on his creation, the gull-wing DMC-12, in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Due to rising costs, DeLorean ended up having to rush the car to market and sold it for more than twice the original asking price. The high price, coupled with bad reviews, led DeLorean Motor to sell only half of what it expected to sell. The company declared bankruptcy in 1982 after its founder got embroiled in personal scandals, including an arrest in a drug-smuggling scheme.


Woolworth


Woolworth was once the biggest retailer in the world, but the combination of poor performance and market dynamics forced it to close its namesake U.S. stores for good in 1997. The company’s department stores had been moving from stand-alone stores to malls, but the setup costs were higher than what the stores were making in returns, according to The Woolworths Museum. Fortunately, the F.W. Woolworth Company spent much of the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s buying out specialty stores, including Foot Locker, so the company continues to live on through its other properties.


TWA


TWA was once one of the world’s most recognized and respected airlines. Its roots trace back to 1930 when Western Air merged with Transcontinental Air Transport to create Transcontinental and Western Air. The airline expanded and modernized under the leadership of aviation pioneer Howard Hughes during the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s, and fared well after U.S. airlines deregulated in 1978. However, deregulation also made TWA a takeover target, and in 1985 it was purchased by corporate raider Carl Icahn. Icahn’s focus was on short-term profit rather than long-term investment in its systems, and TWA ended up going into debt. It filed for bankruptcy in 1992 and again in 1995, and was purchased by American Airlines in 2001, USA Today reported.


Enron


Energy-trading company Enron collapsed after a major accounting fraud scheme was revealed in 2001. In October of that year, the company admitted that it had overstated earnings dating back to 1997. In December, after being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Enron’s bankruptcy filing was the largest in U.S. history at the time, CNN reported. In 2008, a class-action lawsuit filed by shareholders and investors was settled in federal court, and it was ruled that the banks involved in the accounting fraud scheme would have to pay out $7.2 billion.


Tower Records


Before you could access any song with the click of a button, music stores like Tower Records were immensely popular with music lovers. The chain started as an offshoot of a Sacramento, California, drugstore owned by founder Russ Solomon’s father and eventually expanded into an international empire. However, Tower’s rapid expansion was a major contributor to its downfall as it took on $110 million debt to become the dominant chain in the music biz, NPR reported. The debt — combined with Tower’s inability to compete with lower CD prices at big-box stores and the rise of online music sources like Napster and iTunes — led to the company’s eventual demise after more than 40 years in business. Tower Records declared bankruptcy in 2006.


Lincoln Savings & Loan


Charles Keating’s Phoenix-based construction company acquired Lincoln Savings & Loan in 1984 and made billions by selling Lincoln customers $200 million worth of unsecured “junk” bonds. The good times didn’t last long, though. Keating was convicted on federal racketeering charges related to defrauding investors, though those charges were later thrown out, according to NBC News. His company went bankrupt in the process. The demise of Lincoln Savings & Loan was the costliest savings and loan debacle of the 1980s, NBC News reported.


Pictured: Charles Keating during a hearing for Lincoln Savings and Loan


Pan Am


Pan Am was one of the premier names in the airline industry during the 1970s, but things took a turn for the worse over the next two decades. Rising fuel costs, a fleet that was too big for the market and a series of missteps led the airline to begin selling off some of its major assets through the ’80s, including the famous Pan Am building in New York. The airline was still losing money in 1988 when one of its flights was bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland. Pan Am failed to reach potential deals for a buyout by Delta and TWA, and the company shut down for good in 1991.


E.F. Hutton


Investment firm E.F. Hutton was best known for its advertising slogan, “When E.F. Hutton talks, people listen.” The company was well-regarded during the early 1980s but ran into trouble midway through the decade when it pleaded guilty to 2,000 counts of mail and wire fraud. E.F. Hutton admitted to taking part in a check-kiting scheme that involved making bank withdrawals and deposits that gave it illegal access to millions of interest-free dollars. It paid more than $10 million in penalties as a result, Money reported. Following the 1987 stock market crash, the E.F. Hutton brand disappeared amid a series of mergers. Although E.F. Hutton has made numerous attempts at a revival — including a 2018 foray into the world of cryptocurrency — the company has failed to return to its former glory.


Arthur Andersen


Accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP got caught up in the Enron scandal. In June 2002, the company was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding and doctoring documents related to Enron audits, ABC News reported. Two months later, after 89 years in business, Arthur Andersen told the SEC it would no longer audit public companies. That same year, 23 former Arthur Andersen partners founded a new tax practice under the name WTAS and changed the name 12 years later to Andersen Tax.


Pictured: Arthur Andersen executives testify on the shredding of Enron documents


Compaq


When Compaq emerged on the personal computer scene in 1982, IBM was already a giant in the field. Despite the odds against it, Compaq quickly rose to become a Fortune 500 company just four years after it was founded thanks to its range of portable PCs, PC Guide reported. Several missteps led to the company’s eventual downfall, including the 1998 acquisition of Digital Equipment Corporation for $9.6 billion — which ended up being a bad match — and a shift in focus from retail to direct marketing. By 1999, Compaq’s sales were declining. Two years later Dell had taken Compaq’s place as the leader in PC systems. In 2002, HP acquired Compaq for $25 billion but continued to manufacture products under the Compaq brand. In 2013, HP officially discontinued the Compaq brand.


Pictured: Eckhard Pfeiffer, chief executive of Compaq Computer Corp., left, shakes hands with Robert Palmer, chairman and CEO of Digital Equipment Corp


WorldCom


At its height, telecommunications company WorldCom handled 50% of all U.S. internet traffic and 50% of all emails worldwide, according to How Stuff Works. But in 1999, the company’s revenue growth slowed and its stock price began to fall. To boost earnings — on paper, anyway — CEO Bernie Ebbers began cooking the books. WorldCom started classifying operating expenses as long-term capital investments and accounted for $500 million in computer expenses with no documentation to back them up. These changes made the company appear more valuable than it was by turning its losses into $1.38 billion in profits. The SEC grew suspicious about the numbers — especially since another telecom giant, AT&T, was losing money — and requested more information from WorldCom. After an internal audit, WorldCom admitted to inflating its profits. Shortly after the audit began in 2002, WorldCom filed for bankruptcy. Ebbers was found guilty of fraud and violating securities laws. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison.


Adelphia Communications


Adelphia Communications was one of America’s largest cable companies before fraudulent behavior pushed it into bankruptcy. The company was founded by John Rigas, who also served as its CEO and chairman. He and his three sons all sat on the company’s board, as did his son-in-law. The family used Adelphia funds to buy back company stock and used it to purchase perks off the books, including vacation homes, corporate jets and several cars, CNET reported. It all went downhill on an earnings call when a Merrill Lynch analyst questioned how the family could afford to buy back over a billion dollars of company stock. CFO Tim Rigas, one of John Rigas’ sons, had no explanation. Two months later, all of the Rigases had resigned and the company went into bankruptcy stemming from an estimated $3.1 billion in debts the family had accrued. John and Tim Rigas were sentenced to 15 and 20 years in prison, respectively. In 2005, Time Warner and Comcast officially purchased all of Adelphia Communications’ assets.


Refco


Commodities trader Refco was valued at $3.5 billion shortly after its IPO in August 2005. Just a couple of months later the company filed for bankruptcy after an internal audit discovered that the CEO, Phillip R. Bennett, owed $430 million in debts that he kept hidden through a series of undisclosed transactions, Forbes reported. Although Bennett paid the money back and stepped down from his position, the damage to Refco’s reputation had already been done and it collapsed after the bankruptcy filing.


Bayou Hedge Fund Group


Samuel Israel started the Bayou Hedge Fund Group in 1995 and a year later the company had already raised $300 million. What investors didn’t know was that it was basically a Ponzi scheme. The company suffered heavy losses from the time of its founding through 2002 — roughly $55 million, according to The New York Times — but it used a fake accounting firm to audit its financials so that Bayou could hide the losses from investors.


Then, in 2004, Israel drained Bayou’s accounts of $161 million over the course of six days and wired the money to different banks in an attempt to hide the stolen funds from authorities. An SEC suit filed in 2005 alleged that over the course of the fund’s existence, Israel and his CFO had misappropriated millions of dollars for their personal use, CNN reported. Israel pleaded guilty to fraud in 2005 and Bayou filed for bankruptcy the following year.


Bear Stearns


Investment bank Bear Stearns was one of the first casualties of the 2008 financial crisis. It had survived the Great Depression and the economic downturn that occurred following the September 11 attacks, but the bank took a knockout punch when its clients and trading partners started fleeing because Bear Stearns had made huge bets on toxic mortgage loans. In March 2008, after operating for 85 years as an independent company, it agreed to a government-backed fire sale and was acquired by JPMorgan Chase to avoid bankruptcy, CNN reported.


Lehman Brothers


As with Bear Stearns, the subprime mortgage crisis led to the demise of fellow investment bank Lehman Brothers. At the time of its collapse, it was the nation’s fourth-largest investment bank, with around 25,000 employees across the globe, according to the History Channel. By 2007, Lehman Brothers had $111 billion in real estate-related assets and securities, so when the real estate market took a tumble, Lehman reported its first losses since 1994. In September 2008, Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy with $639 billion in total assets and $613 billion in debts, making it the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history.


Washington Mutual


Toxic mortgage debt also led to the 2008 collapse of Washington Mutual. WaMu was shut down by the U.S. government, making it the largest American banking failure in history, Reuters reported. At the time it was closed by the federal Office of Thrift and Supervision, Washington Mutual had $307 billion in assets and $188 billion in deposits. Its assets were sold to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion.


Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities


The name Bernie Madoff has become synonymous with “Ponzi scheme” ever since the financier was found guilty of defrauding investors of billions of dollars. Madoff founded his namesake investment firm in 1960. In December 2008, he reportedly told one of his employees that he had been operating a Ponzi scheme that lost about $50 billion. Madoff was arrested for securities fraud the next day.


Madoff’s “business” was bound to fail at some point. The way his Ponzi scheme worked is that he would use funds from new investors to pay off promised returns to older investors. But when clients requested $7 billion in returns, Madoff only had about $200 million to $300 million in the fund, Business Insider reported. Madoff was ultimately charged with 11 counts of fraud, money laundering, perjury and theft and sentenced to 150 years in prison.


Hummer


Inspired by the Humvee military vehicle, Hummers had a cult following of off-road vehicle lovers before GM shut the brand down in 2010. The gas-guzzling vehicles were always shunned by environmentalists, but even fans of the car stopped buying them when gas prices rose above $4 a gallon in 2008. Sales of the Hummer dropped from 27,000 vehicles in 2008 to just 9,000 in 2009, CBS News reported. GM discontinued the brand after a deal to sell it to a Chinese company fell through.


Kodak


Iconic camera and film company Kodak, founded in 1888, earned a reputation over the next century as an innovator and even pioneered the development of digital photography in the mid-1970s. Although Kodak’s downfall is largely blamed on its failure to pursue digital sales on a mass scale, that isn’t really the whole story, according to Inc. Kodak did invest in a line of EasyShare digital cameras as well as digital photo printing. However, it was a little late to the game, and the company still relied too heavily on developing film, a service that became mostly obsolete. Kodak declared bankruptcy in 2011 but continues to operate.


Multiply


Multiply added to the lineup of social media sites back in 2003 where users shared media content through their personal profiles. It started out as a social networking site but switched to e-commerce in August 2012 when Multiply gained millions of unique visitors. But when Multiply didn’t make enough profit on the following year, the site had to close down its operations on May 31, 2013 and soon closed as a company on April 1, 2015.


At that time, the website's social networking portion had a network of 18 million users. Liquidity problems, however, affected earnings. Sales declined from its peak of P20 billion in 2013 to just about P5 billion in 2017.




“We regret to announce that Multiply will be closing on May 6, 2013, and ceasing all business operations by May 31, 2013,” it announced last April 26, 2013 on its website.

After May 6, the rest of the month will be used to ensure that all accounts are settled and merchants get full payment for their transactions, it said.

Multiply said the month-long grace period will provide its users enough time to find and migrate to alternative e-commerce platforms, settle all payments on items bought and delivered, and minimize disruption to businesses of its users.

“Multiply will ensure that you receive all funds you earned on the platform no later than May 31, 2013. We will close the actual marketplace sooner, on May 6, 2013, to ensure that all orders have sufficient time to complete and be delivered to your customers before the end of the month,” it said.


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/enron-24-other-most-epic-184839865.html

After closing its doors, Multiply might be making a comeback



Multiply was dead, but it might not stay that way.

Although the website closed as a social networking site on December 1, 2012 and close down last May 6 and ceasing all business operations on May 31, 2013 along with the official online channels for the site had been removed along with all their content, including its YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram accounts, after years of financial and managerial turmoil and following a failed bid to reinvent itself from being a social networking site to a vibrant e-commerce destination in Southeast Asia, the owners of the defunct global social networking site might be eyeing a return, according to Monday court filings.

In the midst of an auction for its remaining assets, the hedge fund that owns the company decided to hang onto the Multiply brand name and other assets, such as their operations, the international subsidiary Multiply International and the social networking portion including 18 million user accounts with hosted blogs, videos, photos and messaging plus 691 million photos from Webshots, while considering “a new, operating Multiply branding company,” according to court documents.

Per statistics, Multiply has approximately 18 million users worldwide and 5.5 million users in the Philippines.

The potential revival would keep its global license agreements and “can invest in and create new, domestic and international businesses under the Multiply name, as well as expand its international presence and further develop its business,” the documents state.

The plan suggests that investors think it would be more lucrative to revamp the former social networking industry juggernaut than it would be to sell the pieces to qualified bidders.

The filings didn’t give any further details about what the business’s comeback might look like, nor did it offer a timeline.

Jeremy Williams, an attorney representing Multiply’s debtors, declined to comment on the future of the website.

After nine years of business, Multiply struggled in recent years to keep up with big-box and online competitors.

The company’s closure affected some 50,000 jobs.

"Sayang yung Multiply talaga. Kung by the time umupo si pangulong Duterte may existing Multiply na, eh di sana I-merge with Friendster and Webshots na lang sa mas malaking social network." (Unfortunately Multiply really. If President Duterte sat down with existing Multiply already, he wouldn't have merged with Friendster and Webshots just on the larger social network.)

"Seven years after the closure my God is still the fault of the previous administration"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/10/03/after-closing-its-doors-toys-r-us-might-be-making-comeback/

Multiply reopens online operations



Defunct E-commerce and social networking site Multiply has reopened its online operations following seven-year closure.

Although the website is fully functional again, it is used to download and view their old photos and videos from old Friendster, Fotolog, Multiply and Webshots accounts.

Multiply gives you an easy way to share all kinds of digital media, including photos, blogs, videos, music and more, all in one convenient place: your own personal web site. With Multiply, you can share and discuss your stuff with everyone in your “social network,” and also be alerted whenever they have something new. 
Your personal web site on Multiply – http://YOURNAME.multiply.com – is the one place where you can share many different types of content. No longer do you, or your friends and family, need to learn how to use separate sites (and keep track of separate IDs, passwords, and links).

In a statement, Multiply said operations will be undertaken by employees who are willing and able to return to work safely. In addition, it has significantly reduced the number of employees working in its offices at any one time to enable it to enforce social distancing.

It launched a app for smartphones, smart TVs, tablets and digital media players, is planning to roll out archive photo and video services on October 1.

Silver linings

‘In my eyes, in fact, the most important silver lining in all of these is the chance for us to look towards 2022 with the experience of 2020 in our hearts and minds.’

MONTHS ago, Sen. Pia Cayetano was savaged on social media after she was reported to have said she “welcomed” the onset of the coronavirus. It was an unfortunate event, she said, but it “opens our eyes and gives us that window of opportunity to provide necessary funding attention and efforts that our healthcare deserves.”

The onslaught on social media followed after a reporter painted Cayetano as welcoming the pandemic which, the reporter said, “has already crippled the economy, killed hundreds of Filipinos and left thousands hungry and jobless.”

If I haven’t known the senadora for over 30 years now I may have been incited to also heap opprobrium on her. But knowing her better than most (with the exception of her family, her loyal staff and closest friends) I knew what she was trying to say, and I knew that it was just her phrasing that was problematic.

She is not one of those in government whose turn of phrase speaks 100% of their intent.

So much so that spokesmen stumble over each other trying to say that what was said was not what was meant. For Cayetano, unfortunate as the pandemic was, it was welcome because it opened our eyes. Welcome, because it’s here, it’s a fact, and we just need to deal with it the right way – including paying proper attention to our healthcare.

This point is made more stark with the developments at PhilHealth that, according to its president, not even Superman can solve.

But back to Sen. Pia’s point. How many of us – in our attempt to cope with a pandemic which at times seems beyond coping – have stopped to think about life in general and our own in particular in ways we would not have been compelled to do if not for COVID-19?

How many of us have not taken time to examine our lives, in the privacy of our thoughts, maybe just as we are about to go to bed or after we wake up, grateful to live another day?

How many of us have not used this occasion to identify what really matter in our lives – people, property, dreams and ambitions even – and in the process come to terms with the good fortune we already have but have hardly noticed?

And how many of us have not come to the point of doing 180-degree turns on things we were hell-bent on doing or pursuing or achieving before the pandemic struck – but now realize what we thought we really wanted to have or even to be is not essential to our sense of fulfillment and contentment and over-all happiness?

This is what we should continue doing, or start doing if we haven’t yet, while the world is on “time out” as it seeks to get a grip on this novel coronavirus. It’s a chance to ask ourselves what truly matter to us, to understand what are of value to us, and in the process to understand who we truly are.

And I mean this both on a personal (family, work, business, etc.) as well as a community level (as a citizen most importantly). When we are confronted with how fragile life can be in a way that is so total and encompassing because everyone is at risk, we better take the opportunity granted to be clear about what matters to us and what we need to do to make sure we do not find ourselves in a similar situation in the future.

For Sen. Pia, it was a welcome opportunity to focus proper attention on healthcare – a matter close to her heart but which most of us take for granted until the point in time when a personal crisis forces us to confront the weaknesses of our healthcare system. Indeed, when politicians promised a system of universal health care, we all cheered. But very few really have tried to understand how this would work, especially on matters of funding and implementation, which are at the heart of such a system. We want to be a Sweden – but can we?

For me, other than some personal resolutions on health matters, I’m more focused on my community commitments. I feel that as I reach senior citizen status it is time I pay attention more to what I can do to help others, because I think I’ve done a good job so far helping myself.

And that’s why I see some silver linings in this crisis, one of which is allowing us as citizens to focus on ourselves as part of a bigger community. How we as a community led by our government have handled the crisis is a lesson-in-progress. It hopefully wakes us up to the importance of trust in society, especially trust in people in authority, a function of putting the right or capable people in the right or proper places. It hopefully tells us that when we are confronted with a pandemic like COVID – which, unfortunately, won’t be the last of it – we should know how and how not to respond: meaning, switching to a science-based mode than to a command-and-control approach, one that is anchored on data rather than politics. In Singapore, for example, the brains behind the country’s COVID approach are the doctors and scientists who grappled with the SARS outbreak a few years back; here? And think about it: if, despite the science-based approach, Singapore still had to struggle with keeping the virus in check, how can we expect any better from our own muddled actions, what I have tagged #LaggingHanda?

In my eyes, in fact, the most important silver lining in all of these is the chance for us to look towards 2022 with the experience of 2020 in our hearts and minds. “Tal pueblo, talgobierno,” said Jose Rizal, and yes indeed we get the government we deserve. So do we deserve more of the same? Or shouldn’t we always strive to be better?

Keep this in mind: because the silver lining is simply a chance or an opportunity, it is a chance or an opportunity we have to grab – because if we don’t, we lose it until the next pandemic comes around.

And I will bet that no one is really in the mood to welcome another one any time in our lifetimes, yes?

Personal: Happy healthy birthday Angie Tan Riosa; John Jay Jimenez; Gec Chia and Atty Olma Inocentes, Mother Lily Monteverde; Carlette Estadilla; Avel Bacudio; Paulo Perez; Marietalouisa Beltran; Jason V. Alcoriza; Janell Tonog Espino; Kevin Christopher Ty; Terence Khan; Len Floriendo from Christian Petel Floirendo; Eva Gutierrez grandmother of Gutierrez Santarin Cynthia; Kagawad Hussam Kulong of Barangay Pineda, Pasig City; Shanice Jade Encienzo daughter of Sdemi Encienzo; preng Roval Arlene-Roval Villestas from Paul Domingo; Clifford pusing; Manie Secondes; Betcha Raniezes; auntie Elena Elmido from Neriza Loreño Diama; Fr. Michael Balatbat

https://malaya.com.ph/index.php/news_opinion/silver-linings/

Does God Punish Us With Tragedy?

Neither this man nor his parent sinned, said Jesus. John 9:3

We live in a broken, imperfect world, and one of the results is that bad things do happen to good people; but when we are confronted with that stark reality, almost always our hearts cry out, "Why, God? Why did this happen to me?"

Please understand I am not an "armchair authority," an expert who has all the answers; but believe me, friend, I have done some hard searching with a Bible in one hand and a handkerchief in the other to keep the tears from blotting the words on the page.  I have sat at the bedsides of literally dozens of people and asked silently many, many times, "God, why did this have to happen to this person, why not some degraded individual who deserved to get it in the neck?"

Together let's examine some of the reasons people kick around, answering the question, "Why do bad things happen to good people?"  One of the most common answers that you will hear is that someone really isn't so good, that the bad thing happened as the result of personal failure or wrongdoing. While this may be true in some cases, that answer doesn't satisfy me. Do you know why?  God knows the heart and we don't.  That answer almost always seems to come from the self-righteous individual who points at the person who is down and says, "It must be because you are not as good as I."

You first read about this mentality in the book of Job, one of the oldest of all human dramas.  When covered with boils and robbed of his family and possessions by one tragedy after another, Job was alone and grief stricken.  That's when Job's friends came to comfort him, but their comfort turned into bitter accusations as they said, "Job, why don't you confess your fault and perhaps God will have mercy."  Even his wife counseled, "Curse God and die;" but he did not die and he struggled with the very issue for days and months.

In the New Testament we find this same suggestion when Jesus was confronted with a man who had been born blind and the disciples asked, "...who sinned, this man or his parents...?"  (John 9:1).  You can read about it in the ninth chapter of the Gospel of John.  If it is true that tragedy is punishment, it would also be true that God is unjust and cruel because a lot of innocent individuals suffer.  Have you ever walked through the pediatrics department of a hospital and viewed some of the tiny babies with their bodies racked by pain?  Are we to think that these innocent individuals are being punished for something they have done or their forebears did?

As I mentioned earlier, it is because of this that some reject God, attempting to define God in terms of tragedy rather than tragedy in terms of God.

When bad things happen to good people, our conscience always cries out and we think, "Well, maybe it is because of my personal failure that this has happened."  Nobody is perfect; even the best of us are sinners, and when we begin to think like that we have forgotten some very important Biblical truths:  Christians are not perfect--just forgiven.  We have lost sight of the fact that when Jesus died for the sins of the world, He also died for my sins and failures.  We have lost sight of the fact that because God loved me, He sent His Son to bring me back into His family--adopted as His own child.

When we try to explain why bad things happen to good people in terms of our personal failure, we lose sight of the fact that God does not love me or punish me in terms of my essential goodness but because of the very nature of His goodness and love.  It is He who is love and His nature is to love, not to inflict punishment on me--punishment which my Lord endured when He was nailed to the tree.

Resource reading: Psalm 1:1-6

https://www.guidelines.org/devotional/does-god-punish-us-with-tragedy/