Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Crunch time for the BBL

The passage of the Bangsamoro Basic Law may be the single most consequential legislative objective of the Duterte administration, but it has unfortunately been overtaken by other priorities or overshadowed by other sideshows: impeachment threats and actual impeachment complaints, the ill-advised attempt to postpone the barangay elections yet again, the continuing campaign to change the system of government from unitary to federal.

Now the 17th Congress, controlled in both chambers by supermajorities allied (and aligned) with the Duterte administration, is staring at the bottom of the legislative barrel. It has less than a week left before it adjourns until the State of the Nation Address in July.

How important is the proposed BBL?

Enough for President Duterte to say, wearily, last April: “Nangangako ako na before May, lulusot ’yan … before the end of May, lulusot na ’yan. ’Pag hindi, baka mag-resign ako pagka-presidente. Inyo na lang ’yan, hindi ko talaga kaya.” (I promise that before May, that will pass … before the end of May, that will pass. If not, I might resign as President. You can have it, I really can’t do it).

The President has been known to wax emotional in public before, and indeed to claim that he was too old or too tired to continue in the presidency.

Passage of the BBL ranks among the few issues that have caused him to confess just giving everything up: “It’s useless. If you give me this kind of administration until the end of my term, frankly, I would rather resign. Napapagod na ako (I’m getting tired) to solve the problem.”

Going into the last three days of the second session of the 17th Congress, “this kind of administration” faces serious obstacles in passing the BBL.

As presidential spokesperson Harry Roque admitted on Tuesday morning: “There are kinks that are being ironed out but their promise is to pass the BBL. We would like the BBL enacted before Congress goes on recess on June 2 … The promise is they would do everything humanly possible to pass the BBL. Certifying it as urgent may not happen because of the conflicting versions of the Senate and House.”

This was an unusual position to take, because one of the uses of a presidential certification of urgency is precisely to force the Senate and the House to reconcile conflicting versions of a legislative measure.

And one of its effects is that the mandatory three-day waiting period between second and third readings is considered waived.

Perhaps Roque did not understand what the true situation was?

The Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, Secretary Jesus Dureza, insisted that the President had committed to a speedy passage in a late-Monday meeting with congressional leaders.

“The meeting adjourned with a general consensus that the two chambers conclude their work at the earliest possible time and if there are varying versions, that the mandated bicameral committees of both chambers meet to come up with a joint reconciled and accepted version,” Dureza said.

“The President said he would certify the bill as urgent,” he added.

Finally, at around mid-afternoon on Tuesday, the head of the Presidential Legislative Liaison Office, Secretary Adelino Sitoy, told reporters that the BBL certification had been transmitted to Senate President Vicente Sotto III.

The lack of clarity that persisted until mid-afternoon is frustrating, but at least the President has again put the full force of his office behind the BBL.

The certification of urgency is needed to push the passage of the law. Necessary, but not sufficient.

As important as the substance of the proposed law is, and even though the passage of the law has serious consequences for the peace process in Mindanao, the chambers of Congress have run into the hard wall that is the legislative calendar.

Can they pass the law before the President delivers his third Sona?

House Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas has a clever plan. He thinks that the bicameral conference committee can work on the reconciled version of the bill between now and the fourth Monday of July, when the Constitution requires Congress to begin a new session.

The conference version can then be ratified by the two chambers, meeting separately in the morning, and then passed and signed into law before the President addresses the nation in the afternoon.

It’s a long shot, but it’s crunch time, and Congress needs to take it.



Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/113558/crunch-time-bbl#ixzz5GxuEhOsu
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

Duterte’s ‘urgent’ edict on self-rule for Muslims


  • The decades-long armed conflict in Mindanao that caused more than 120,000 deaths
  • The commission has also agreed that control of the defense, police and coast guard will be retained by the national government


MANILA: Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has given an “urgent” certification to the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) that will give wider autonomy to the country’s Muslim minority.

The president’s decision on Tuesday came one day after he held separate meetings with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), led by its chairman, Murad Ibrahim, and leaders of Congress.

Senate President Vicente Sotto III on Tuesday said he had spoken to Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea, who told him that Malacanang would send them the certification that the BBL is an urgent measure.

The office of the presidential liaison office later announced it had sent the BBL certification to Sotto.

Jesus Dureza, the presidential adviser on the peace process, said that “after much deliberation, the president has decided to make the House and Senate versions of the BBL as urgent.”

Dureza said earlier that during their meeting with Duterte on Monday, leaders from the Senate and House of Representatives vowed to pass the proposed BBL “at the earliest possible time.”

“It was a good meeting with all leaders of the House and the Senate, including their members who expressed strongly on their views on the bill,” Dureza said.

He said that Duterte first met with the MILF leadership before organizing a separate meeting with government representatives.

“The president initially expressed his own personal views and initial assessments which resonated well to all,” Dureza said.

The meeting agreed that the two chambers would complete their work as soon as possible.

Following the commitment of leaders of both Houses to pass the BBL and iron out any disagreements in a bicameral conference, Duterte agreed to certify the bill as urgent.

House Majority Leader Rodolfo Farinas, who took part in the meeting with the president, said Duterte did not impose anything on Congress, but granted their request to certify the BBL bill to allow both houses of Congress to pass their respective versions of the measure before they adjourn on Wednesday.

“We will then have a bicameral conference committee during the break, which will resolve conflicting provisions of our bills in collaboration with the Executive Department and the Bangsamoro Transition Commission,” said Farinas. The bicam conference committee report will be submitted for ratification by the both chambers of Congress on July 23.

Once both chambers have finalized the version, Duterte is expected to sign the BBL in time for his “state of the nation” address on the same day.

Farinas on Monday said the Bangsamoro Transition Commission had agreed to most of the proposed amendments to the draft BBL, including naming the new entity that will be created by the law as the Autonomous Region of Bangsamoro (ARB).

The commission has also agreed that control of the defense, police and coast guard will be retained by the national government. “There will be a police region in the Bangsamoro, but it will still be under the PNP (Philippine National Police).”

Agreement has yet to be reached on two major proposed amendments — the opt-in clause and fiscal autonomy for the Bangsamoro. Once the BBL is passed and approved by the president, a plebiscite will be held within 150 days. The MILF chair told Arab News they are “optimistic that once the Bangsamoro (bill) will be in place, it will be supported by the majority of the people in the area.

“Then we can be assured that security issues will be improved and the economic activities of the people will be also increased as there will be peace in the area. So that is expected in the future,” Murad said.

The BBL was the result of a peace agreement between the administration of then President Benigno Aquino III and the MILF to pave the way for the creation of a Bangsamoro region to replace the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.

However, passage of the bill stalled in 2015 following a clash between Philippine National Police commandos and MILF fighters in Maguindanao province that left 44 troopers and 18 MILF fighters dead.

When Duterte assumed presidency in 2016, he urged Congress to pass the bill, which is expected to address the decades-long armed conflict in Mindanao that caused more than 120,000 deaths.

Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Duterte certifies as urgent the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law

President Rodrigo Duterte on Tuesday, May 29, certified the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law as urgent following his meeting with the House and Senate leadership in Malacañang.

This was confirmed by Presidential Spokesperson Secretary Harry Roque.

“After much deliberation, the President has decided to make the House and Senate versions of the BBL as urgent and copy of it is on its way to both houses of Congress,” Roque said.

Roque added that “once both chambers have reconciled and finalized the version, the President will sign the Bangsamoro Basic Law.”

#AweSM60 Greetings

Nora Aunor topbills GMAs ‘Onanay’

Nora Aunor
Superstar Nora Aunor leads the upcoming GMA Network primetime drama series “Onanay.”

The actress plays a special role on the series as Nelia, a loving and caring grandmother who is kind yet willing to fight for what is right and will do everything for her family.

She is proud to be part of the series. “Gusto ko ’yung teleserye at maganda ’yung istorya. Tungkol ito sa kung paano magmahal ang isang ina sa isang anak, at kung paano ipagtanggol ang isang anak ng ina.”

The actress is excited to work with some of the network’s sought-after and talented artists. “Dahil sa tagal na hindi ako gumawa ng mga ganitong serye, kabado po ako at dito sa bagong show, ’yung mga bata na ang nakakasama ko. May kaba pero excited din dahil maganda ang kwento,” she said.

Under the helm of Gina Alajar, Nora will be joined by Mikee Quintos, Kate Valdez and Cherie Gil. The series also introduces newest Kapuso, Jo Berry who auditioned for the role of Onay, the vertically challenged daughter of Nelia. Completing the cast are Gardo Versoza, Wendell Ramos, Rochelle Pangilinan, Vaness del Moral, Enrico Cuenca and special guest Adrian Alandy.

• • •

Praised by fans


Jacklyn Jose

Aside from the lead stars of “The Cure,” Jennylyn Mercado and Tom Rodriguez, fans watch the show for the award-winning actress Jaclyn Jose who plays Dr. Lazaro.

Many viewers praise Jaclyn’s performance, as in “ibang Jaclyn Jose ang mapapanood sa seryeng ito.”

What will happen now that Charity (Jennylyn) seems to be one of those infected by the virus? “The Cure” airs weeknights after “24 Oras” on GMA Telebabad.

• • •

Tidbits: Happy b-day greetings today, May 29, go to Celia Laurel, Robbie Tan, Pearl Susim, Emma Gutierrez, Ruby Villaruz, Dr. Luz Espiritu, Oliver Bundalian, Col. Reynaldo Gopilan, Virgie Lovely, Pacita Aguirre, Dianne Bautista, Shirley Uy, Berna Duran Velasco, Ines Ragodon, Shirley Uy, Narciso Talampas Jr., Rommel PlacenteLiza Madrienes and Barbara MilanoMay 30: Marlene dela Peña, Ricky Davao, Rep. Bingbong Crisilogo, Glenda Barretto, Rene Austria, Roxanne Lapus, Pocholo Malillin of Club Mwah, Ferdie Villar, Ronalisa Cheng, Chito Chavez, Marilen Cojuangco, Dr. Jofe Syquia, Mary Grace Macahindog, Leslie Lomeda, Midz Reyes, Monina Capili, Jacqueline Sagmit, and MB Entertainment’s Teresa G. Martinez

Monday, May 28, 2018

Senate renews franchises of 4 broadcast firms

Bills extending the franchises of four broadcasting companies to 25 more years hurdled the third and final reading at the Senate on Monday.

The Senate approved the renewal of franchises of the Manila Broadcasting Co., Bright Star Broadcasting Corp., Notre Dame Broadcasting Corp. and Vanguard Radio Network Co., Inc.

“Broadcasting services are the nervous system of our society as they connect communities and families through a seamless flow of information,” Senator Grace Poe, chairperson of the Committee on Public Services,” said on Monday.

“The Committee deems it fit to integrate a new provision mandating the grantees decent and productive employment opportunities as well as apprenticeship programs or on-the-job trainings for students and young Filipinos,” she added.

Poe highlighted in her sponsorship speech the role played by the Manila Broadcasting Co., which is known by its flagship AM radio station DZRH, in the nation’s history from World War II to the EDSA Revolution and even up to the administrations of former Presidents Corazon Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, and Benigno Aquino III.

Created on April 1992, Bright Star or Retro 105.9 DCG-FM plays a diverse mix of retro pop, dance, hip-hop, rap, R&B, new wave and soul music.

Vanguard Radio provides news and entertainment through its broadcast stations in Nueva Ecija, Baguio City, La Union, Nueva Vizcaya, Isabela, Cagayan, and Bohol.

An affiliate of the Catholic Media Network, Notre Dame Broadcasting is based in Kidapawan City and was founded in 1956.

“Congress has the responsibility to ensure that only the most qualified individuals and organizations should be granted this privilege,” Poe said. ee

Read more: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/995090/senate-renews-franchises-of-4-broadcast-firms#ixzz5Gndkyo7u
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

Philippine Identification System empowers citizens to exercise rights and allows access to services

The establishment of the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys) will enable Filipinos to have proof of identity, to exercise rights and privileges and to access vital services.

An announcement made by the Philippine House of Representatives (Philippine Congress) highlighted the benefits of establishing the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys, which include proof of identity, empowerment to exercise rights and privileges as well as access to vital services.

Education, social protection, healthcare, banking and finance are some of the vital services that can be accessed by the Filipinos once the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys) is established, said one of the principal authors of the measure creating a national identification system in the country.

“The PhilSys is particularly important for vulnerable sectors of our population, like those who are marginalized and living in poverty and those living in remote areas. Once they have the means to prove their identity, people will be empowered to exercise their rights and privileges and access basic services,” said Camiguin Representative Xavier Jesus D. Romualdo.

PhilSys is a single national identification system for all citizens and resident aliens of the Philippines. This unified system will promote seamless delivery of service, improve the efficiency, transparency, and targeted delivery of public and social services, and enhance administrative governance.
Moreover, the National ID is expected to reduce corruption, curtail bureaucratic red tape, avert fraudulent transactions and misrepresentations, strengthen financial inclusion, and promote ease of doing business.

Every Filipino and resident alien of the country shall be identified through the use of a unique and permanent PhilSys Number (PSN), which is randomly generated. It shall be the standard number assigned to each individual to be incorporated in all identification systems of government agencies.

According to the Identification for Development initiative of the World Bank, over 16.3 million Filipinos do not have proof of identity and are hindered from availing of government and financial services. Concerns raised by critics against the national ID system involve infringement on the rights and privacy of the citizens.

Rep Romualdo, a member of the bicameral conference committee, dispelled these by saying that Congress assures only basic personal information will be stored in the PhilSys and this information will be protected and kept confidential.

“Only one’s name, sex, address, date and place of birth, blood type, and biometric data, such as facial photo and fingerprints, are required to be entered in the PhilSys. Furthermore, disclosure of and granting access to stored data and information to anyone, even to law enforcement agencies and the military, is prohibited and penalised,” Rep Romualdo explained.

Disclosure of information, according to the reconciled version of the bill, is only allowed when the registered person has given his or her consent, specific to the purpose prior to the processing.

Information can also be disclosed upon order of a competent court, when the compelling interest of public health or safety so requires as long as the risk of significant harm to the public is established and the owner of the information is notified within 72 hours of the fact of such disclosure.

Information obtained as a result of any unauthorised or illegal disclosure is inadmissible in any judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding.

Presidential hits and misses

by Atty. Ignacio R. Bunye

President Rody has a flair for drama which he uses to clearly drive his point.

Instead of just confiscating smuggled luxury cars and auctioning them, as he is allowed by law, he orders them destroyed. And in a dramatic fashion. On two recent occasions, we witnessed on television how multi-million peso cars were flattened and reduced to scrap by graders – to the horror of high end car aficionados.

In his much-touted fight against corruption in government, the President fired persons supposedly very close to him. Not content, he even followed this up with a shame campaign against his former political supporters. Nowadays, he even asks Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque to pre-announce the forthcoming firings.

The message to corrupt officials would have been loud and clear.

Unfortunately, President Rody also has his share of misses which tend to negate his gains.

In his bid to get closer to his new friend – China – he is opening the way for six Chinese firms to corner the bulk (around R17B) of rehabilitation projects for Marawi. On the surface, nothing wrong with that especially if these Chinese companies can offer the best terms. After all, the offer of the Chinese will be subjected to “Swiss Challenge”.

Unfortunately, as it turned out, two of the companies have previously been blacklisted by the World Bank for alleged corrupt dealings involving Philippine projects. In an earlier clarification, the palace said that President Duterte was not aware of the blacklisting. Subsequently, the inclusion of the two companies was justified for the reason that the blacklisting, for 6 years and 5 years of the two companies, had already lapsed.

So what has happened to his “Ayaw ko sa corruption!” pronouncement?

Again, appointees who turned out to be incompetent (if not downright corrupt) were simply re-cycled. They were pulled out from their previous posting and kicked sideways to other jobs with high-sounding titles.

And just recently, he promoted to the next higher rank a Philippine Coast Guard officer who had been suspended over funds misuse allegations.

All of a sudden, the signals coming from the palace have become mixed up.

Marawi – a year hence

Seven months after the cessation of hostilities in Marawi, the rehabilitation of Marawiis moving ever slowly.

Nonetheless, considering the tedious process entailed preparing the rehab plan – much of which was taken up by multi-sectoral consultation on the best development mix – the palace has expressed satisfaction of what has been accomplished so far.

902 priority projects have been identified and are being readied for implementation. Adequate funding – estimated in excess of R70 billion over the next three years – is being budgeted.

Unsatisfied, critics have described the proposed rehabilitation of Marawi as “a patchwork of sketchy plans”. The plans do not address many problems – not the least of which is the age old question of unresolved property rights among the Muslim population. This thorny issue has been tagged as one of the root causes of conflict in Mindanao.

The government is working on it, assures Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process Jess Dureza. Dureza concedes, however, that as of now there is no magic formula which answers all these questions.

At last – a national ID

After several Presidents, we will soon have a national ID system. It is about time. We are one of 9 remaining countries in the world which, to date, have not adopted one.

The advantages far outweigh the disadvantages. Not only will a national ID facilitate public and private transactions. It will also help enhance national and community security.

Of course, a noisy militant minority will continue the protest the system not just for being invasive of privacy but for being reminiscent of the cedula – considered as a sign of subservience to our former colonial masters.

Come one, guys. This is already 2018. Let us just move on. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to be afraid of.
Note: You may email us at totingbunye2000@gmail.com. You may also “like” us at Facebook at “Speaking Out”.

CEZA pursuing expressway, railway projects in Cagayan

The Cagayan Economic Zone Authority (CEZA) is pursuing expressway and railway projects to link the northern part of the country to the capital, its top official told reporters.

In an interview over the weekend, CEZA Administrator and Chief Executive Officer Raul Lambino said the agency is eyeing to build a new six-lane expressway that will connect Cagayan North International Airport to Port Irene in the town of Sta. Ana and Lal-lo to Tuguegarao City to Aparri and Claveria.

Lambino said this will complement the planned Global TransPark System in Cagayan, which targets to have an international cargo airport and seaport; manufacturing, distribution and cold-storage facilities; multi-modal transport linkages; efficient cargo transfer system; and central cargo area.

The Global TransPark System aims to provide seamless and efficient supply chain in the economic zone and the freeport.

Aside from the six-lane expressway, Lambino said CEZA aims to build a parallel railway system for passengers and cargo to provide better connectivity as well as faster, cheaper, and more efficient way to transfer goods.
He mentioned that a Russian company is studying and looking into linking Cagayan and Manila through a high-speed train system.

To pursue these infrastructure projects, Lambino said CEZA is requesting Congress to release the remaining PHP14 billion investment of the government in the agency as stated in the Republic Act No.7922 or the Cagayan Special Economic Zone Act

Congress to ratify national ID bill today

After three decades of languishing in the legislative mill, the national ID system bill is expected to be ratified by Congress today, the final step before it is transmitted to President Duterte for his signature.

Sen. Panfilo Lacson, principal author and sponsor of the bill, said the measure is something that he has been pushing for since he first became senator in 2001.

First proposed during the administration of former president Fidel Ramos, the national ID bill has failed to take off due to lack of support in Congress and a general fear of the system because of privacy issues.

But now, with the backing of Duterte, the bill, which is also dubbed as the Philippine ID system, has been approved by both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The bill has also gone through the bicameral conference committee where a consolidated version has been prepared and would be presented today in both chambers of Congress for ratification.

“This is a landmark legislation because it is only under the administration of President Duterte that this was approved,” Lacson said in a radio interview.

The fears raised about the present national ID, according to Lacson, have been unfounded considering that the information that would be stored in the ID are basic details of an individual such as name, birthdate, address, gender, photograph and biometrics.

The senator explained that all these information about a person are already kept by various government agencies that issue IDs or other documents.

“I don’t understand the criticism and opposition (to the national ID). Don’t they have driver’s licenses? Don’t they have passports? Don’t they have voter’s IDs? The information needed for the national ID are the same so why should they complain when they have already gone through the same process before?” he said.
The information contained in the national ID would be kept secure, with the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) as the repository of the data, according to Lacson, adding there are enough safeguards under the proposed law that would keep the data of the national ID holders secure against unauthorized disclosures.

The only people who should be worried about the national ID, according to the senator, are rebels, terrorists and other criminal elements who thrive on anonymity.

“Those with aliases would now have a difficult time maintaining their aliases. I suppose this is the fear of the leftists because there are NPA (New People’s Army), ASG (Abu Sayyaf group), who are fighting the government, so now, with a national ID system, they would be easily identified,” Lacson said.

The bill calls for the allocation of an initial P25 billion for the PSA to implement the law.

Lacson, however, said the PSA has aired its concern that P25 billion might not be enough if all of the safeguards would be included in the law; thus, the actual budget needed could run up to P40 billion.

He added that the implementation could also take some time, with the PSA saying that this could take five years to complete.

16.3 million Filipinos to benefit
More than the taxpayers,  proponents said the poorest of the poor reaching about 16.3 million out of the total 104 million Filipinos today stand to benefit from the establishment of the national ID system or the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys).

“The PhilSys is particularly important for vulnerable sectors of our population, like those who are marginalized and living in poverty and those living in remote areas,” Camiguin Rep. Xavier Jesus Romualdo, one of the principal authors of the bill, said.

“Once they have the means to prove their identity, people will be empowered to exercise their rights and privileges and access basic services,” the chairman of the House committee on government reorganization added.

A study undertaken by the Identification for Development initiative of the World Bank had shown that over 16.3 million Filipinos “do not have proof of identity and are hindered from availing themselves of government and financial services.”

Romualdo said PhilSys would enable “more Filipinos to access vital services, such as education, social protection, health care, banking and finance.”

Another co-author of the bill, former journalist and incumbent Laguna Rep. Sol Aragones, described as a “historical milestone” the passing of the measure after more than 20 years since it was first proposed in Congress.

“We now have an opportunity to create a significant impact and everlasting effect on the lives of our people with something that can fit in our pocket, kasya sa bulsa, in the form of an ID,” the legislator said.

“This ‘one for all, all for one’ ID seeks to synchronize and harmonize all existing government-initiated identification cards, into a unified, comprehensive and efficient system,” she added.

The PhilSys ID, according to Aragones, will be issued to all citizens and resident aliens to provide them with a valid proof of identity and a means to simplify public and private transactions.

“We will no longer need to present multiple IDs to transact with government and private establishments that require individuals to present two or more government-issued IDs,” Aragones assured.

This landmark legislation is expected to promote seamless delivery of service; improve the efficiency, transparency and targeted delivery of public and social services; enhance administrative governance; reduce corruption and curtail bureaucratic red tape; avert fraudulent transactions and misrepresentations, strengthen financial inclusion and promote ease of doing business. – With Delon Porcalla

Sunday, May 27, 2018

Lacson downplays security, privacy ‘threats’ of national ID system

SENATOR Panfilo Lacson downplayed on Sunday the warning raised by some groups that the passage of the national identification system bill would pose a threat to security and people’s privacy, saying that only enemies of the government and those who uses “aliases” will be affected by the measure.

Lacson said the bill, which seeks to establish the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys), would be beneficial to billions of Filipinos because they could use the national ID in all transactions.

He said people would not need to carry all their government issued IDs when opening a bank account, applying for a loan, renewing their passport or driver’s license and other processes that would need proof of identification because their PhilSys would be enough.

Lacson said he found the claim of those saying that a national ID would infringe on people’s right to privacy inconsistent, noting that personal information are contained in passports, drivers’ licenses and other government issued IDs.

“To those criticizing the measure, don’t they have driver’s license, or voter’s ID because the information stated on those IDs, including biometrics, are the same information that will be included in the national ID so why are they complaining when they already underwent the process,” Lacson said.

The senator said that those who would be negatively affected by the implementation of the PhilSys would be those using aliases and enemies of the government intentionally hiding their real identities to carry out their activities.

“So this concern of the leftists, members [of the]Abu Sayyaf group and other enemies of government . . . because with the ID system it would be easy to identify who is who,” added Lacson, the sponsor and one of the authors of the bill.

The bicameral conference committee last week approved the reconciled version of the bill and both the Senate and the House of Representatives were expected to ratify this on Monday so President Rodrigo Duterte could sign it into law.

“This [national ID] will a be a landmark legislation because it is only under the Duterte administration that it would be enacted,” the Senator said, adding that the proposal has gone through four different administrations. JEFFERSON ANTIPORDA

Nat’l ID bill okayed today, fears allayed

SENATOR Panfilo Lacson allayed fears raised by some groups on the impending passage of the National ID system that allegedly will pose threats to security and privacy of a person.

The bicameral conference committee last week approved the reconciled version of the bill and both the Senate and the House of Representatives were expected to ratify the consolidated measure today so President Rodrigo Duterte could sign it into law.

Lacson said that only enemies of the government and those who use “aliases” will be affected by the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys).

“Ang di ko maunawaan ang bumabatikos at kumokontra. Wala ba silang mga driver’s license, wala ba silang mga passport o wala silang voter’s ID? Siguradong meron. Ang information na ilalagay sa national ID, pareho lang information pati biometrics at facial image, iris scan, pareho lang. Bakit sila nagrereklamo e dumaan sila sa ganitong proseso?” Lacson said in a radio interview over dzBB.

The senator said that those who would be negatively affected by the implementation of the PhilSys would be those using aliases and enemies of the government intentionally hiding their real identities.

“Siguro ito ang pinangangamba ng mawalang-galang ang maka-kaliwa kasi may mga NPA, may ASG, ang lumalaban sa gobyerno medyo mahihirapan sila ngayon dahil pag nagkaroon ng ID system makikilala talaga kung sino ang sino,” added Lacson.

The measure, Lacson stressed, would be beneficial to millions of Filipinos because they could use the national ID in all transactions.

“Napakaraming pakinabang. Una, kapag nag-transact tayo ng business sa public institutions o pribado, hindi na tayo hahanapan ng kung anu-anong papeles o dokumento para mapatunayan na tayo ang tao na nag-aapply,” he said.

Lacson added that people would not need to carry all their government issued IDs when opening a bank account, applying for a loan, renewing their passport or driver’s license and other processes that would need proof of identification because their PhilSys would be enough.

Lacson said he found the claim of those saying that a national ID would infringe on people’s right to privacy unfounded, noting that personal information are contained in passports, drivers’ licenses and other government issued IDs.

“This (national ID) will a be a landmark legislation because it is only under the Duterte administration that it would be enacted,” Lacson said, adding that the proposal has gone through four different administrations.

“Tatlong dekada ito kasi 1990s pa si Fidel V. Ramos, kaya halos tatlong dekada at sa Kongreso naman parang 18 years na binubuo ito, kasi mag-18 years ako sa Senate. File ako ng file nito,” Lacson added.

Senators support nat’l ID scheme

THE proposal to have one identification form for every Filipino gained support from Senators Koko Pimentel and JV Ejercito.

Pimentel said that the national ID may be of great help in transacting with government agencies and will be useful when voting.

“Ang importante dito, makakatulong sa transaksyon sa gobyerno kasi you produce one ID na magagamit na sa lahat ng government agency,” said Pimentel.

Ejercito also supports the National ID System.

“Ang sa akin suporta po ako dyan para rin not only for database kundi for security. Saka at least iisa na lang ang ID natin ngayon hindi na 5 o 7 ang dala nating ID. So I support the ID system,” he said.

The consolidated House and Senate measures may soon become law.

According to Senator Ping Lacson, the Senate and the House of Representatives reconciled their differences and agreed on a common version of the bill in a meeting of the bicameral conference committee recently, putting it on the verge of being signed by President Duterte into law.

On the issue of security features of the ID, Pimentel said concerned government agencies are set to come up with a system that will protect digital data.

Ejercito said the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) and IT experts are in charge of protecting the database.

Under the version adopted by the bicameral committee, only the individual’s full name, sex, birthdate, birthplace, address and nationality, as well as biometric information, will be stored in the ID system, Lacson said.

The two panels agreed to adopt the Senate version with minimal amendments, doing away with the proposal in the House to require sensitive information, such as the cardholder’s parents’ names, permanent address, height and weight.

Both the House and Senate versions provide for the creation of a Philippine Identification System to help citizens establish their identity “as a means of simplifying public and private transactions.”

Besides serving as official proof of identity, the ID card may be presented in requesting social welfare, services and benefits from government agencies, applying for passports and driver’s licenses, opening bank accounts, registering as a voter, and getting admitted to schools and hospitals.

Saturday, May 26, 2018

On track for a nat’l ID system

The Asian Development Bank noted in a 2016 report that “for nearly two decades, the government of the Philippines has attempted to establish a national ID system. However, these attempts have faced opposition on constitutional and privacy grounds.”

The report was about the unified multipurpose ID (UMID) system that was put in place in 2005 by then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo through an executive order, which required “all government-owned and -controlled corporations to streamline and harmonize their identification systems.” It was a good start to a national ID system but, according to the ADB, still a weak one, since it was merely based on an executive order and not a law from Congress. It also had very limited coverage—less than 8 percent of the population as of 2015. “In the current UMID system, groups such as the self-employed, the unemployed, minors and those working abroad have not been enrolled,” the report pointed out.

Congress has attempted many times to push for a national ID law, only to meet sustained and fierce opposition from privacy advocates and progressive groups who feared that such a system might result in the invasion of privacy and violation of civil liberties and human rights. Supporters of the system, on the other hand, point to its potential benefits: It would streamline government databases and make official transactions more efficient, while sparing citizens the inconvenience and cost of having to carry around multiple IDs. It could also help battle terrorism and crime.

President Fidel Ramos batted for such a system during his term as part of his administration’s security and counterinsurgency measures, but the proposal was disallowed by the Supreme Court in 1998, ruling that it posed a “clear and present danger” that would violate the right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution.

That long-elusive law now appears closer to becoming a reality with the news that the Senate and the House of Representatives have agreed on a common version of the latest measures to push for a national ID system. Apparently to allay the fears of privacy and human rights advocates, the bicameral version has done away with the House bill’s more detailed information requirements, such as the cardholder’s parents’ names, permanent address, height and weight. The reconciled bill now on track to become law requires only the cardholder’s full name, sex, birthdate, birthplace, address and nationality, as well as biometric information. As reported in this paper: “Besides serving as official proof of identity, the ID card may be presented in requesting social welfare, services and benefits from government agencies, applying for passports and driver’s licenses, opening bank accounts, registering as a voter, and getting admitted to schools and hospitals.”

Still, apprehensions remain. The Makabayan bloc in the House has warned that the bill poses a serious threat to privacy and the right against surveillance. “For a regime that holds a record of criminalizing dissent and silencing vocal critics, this could be an additional arsenal for further espionage and repression,” said Kabataan Rep. Sarah Elago. Added martial law victim and former Commission on Human Rights chair Etta Rosales: “Under more humane conditions where people are free to walk the streets and enjoy the comfort of police protection, I would say ‘yes’ because this facilitates government services to the public. But conditions are not healthy and safe.”

The proposed ID system is said to have included stringent safeguards against, and penalties for, the unwarranted disclosure of private information. But before this measure gets passed and forwarded to Malacañang to be signed into law by President Duterte, the public does need to know: Will they be safe with an all-knowing ID in hand? Anything less, and this critical project needs to be reconsidered.

Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/113462/track-natl-id-system#ixzz5GdDrgpMm
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

PRRD will sign nat’l ID system into law: Palace

President Rodrigo Duterte will sign into law a bill seeking to establish a single Philippine Identification System (PhilSys) once ratified by the two houses of Congress, Malacañang said on Thursday.

“We welcome the approval of the National ID System by the House and Senate bicameral conference committee,” Roque said in a press statement.

“This landmark bill is part of the legislative priority agenda of the Duterte administration to improve the delivery of government services; thus, once ratified, the President will sign this into law,” he added.

Both the Senate and the House of Representatives are expected to ratify the bicameral report on Monday.

The proposed bill seeks to integrate and interconnect some 30 redundant government IDs by coming out with one national ID system, or PhilSys.

The PhilSys will have three key components: the PhilSys Number or PSN, the PhilID and PhilSys Registry.

The PhilID will be a non-transferable card containing on its face the PSN, full name, facial image, date of birth, address and fingerprints of the individual.

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) is mandated to act as the PhilSys Registry, a repository and custodian of all data including the PSN, registered records, and information of all persons registered in the PhilSys.

Under the proposed bill, PhilSys Policy and Coordination Council (PSPCC) will be created with a mandate to formulate policies and guidelines to ensure effective coordination and implementation of the PhilSys

National ID will ensure access to, delivery of public service–solon

THE establishment of the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys) will enable more Filipinos to access vital services, such as education, social protection, health care, banking and finance, according to one of the principal authors of the measure creating a national identification system in the country.

“The PhilSys is particularly important for vulnerable sectors of our population, like those who are marginalized and living in poverty and those living in remote areas. Once they have the means to prove their identity, people will be empowered to exercise their rights and privileges and access basic services,” Rep. Xavier Jesus D. Romualdo of the Lone District of Camiguin said.

According to the Identification for Development initiative of the World Bank, over 16.3 million Filipinos do not have proof of identity and are hindered from availing themselves of government and financial services.

The bicameral conference committee report reconciling the House of Representatives and Senate versions of the measure is set to be ratified by both chambers before Congress adjourns next week.

Allaying concerns raised by critics that the national ID system will infringe on the rights and privacy of citizens, Romualdo, who was a member of the bicameral conference committee, said Congress has ensured that only basic personal information will be stored in the PhilSys and that such information will be protected and kept confidential.

“Only one’s name, sex, address, date and place of birth, blood type and biometric data, such as facial photo and fingerprints, are required to be entered in the PhilSys. Furthermore, disclosure of and granting access to stored data and information to anyone, even to law-enforcement agencies and the military, is prohibited and penalized,” Romualdo explained.

The reconciled version of the bill provides that disclosure of information is allowed only when  the registered person has given his or her consent, specific to the purpose prior to the processing, or, upon order of a competent court, when the compelling interest of public health or safety so requires, provided that the risk of significant harm to the public is established and the owner of the information is notified within 72 hours of the fact of such disclosure. Information obtained as a result of any unauthorized or illegal disclosure is inadmissible in any judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding.

Who’s afraid of a national ID system?

A CONGRESSIONAL bicameral conference committee approved early this week the consolidated version of a bill establishing a national identification system. The ratification of the proposed law by both houses of Congress is set for Monday. Once ratified the bill will then be forwarded to the Office of the President for executive action.

The primary objective of this planned national ID system (NIDS) is to provide a valid proof of identity for all citizens and resident aliens as a means of simplifying public and private transactions. It likewise aims to eliminate the need to present other forms of identification when transacting with the government and the private sector, subject to appropriate authentication measures. It is also envisioned to be a social and economic platform which will ensure seamless delivery of government services.

There is nothing in the soon-to-be-law that mentions the use of the national ID system as a precautionary measure to prevent a terrorist attack. However, I read some media reports saying that the issuance of ID cards can guard against terrorists and suspected criminals.

It was also reported that the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) is tasked to implement the ID system, maintain the centralized database and issue the “tamper-proof” cards to every Filipino. These cards would contain basic information about the cardholders, including some biometrics data.

There is no doubt that the issuance of a national ID to every citizen is “doable.” However, is the collection of the individual’s private data safe?

Way back in August 2016, I wrote about the proposed national ID system in this column. I am reproducing portions of that write-up which are relevant to the current issue.

Previous attempts to establish NIDS

President Fidel V. Ramos, way back in 1996, issued Administrative Order (AO) 308, implementing a National Computerized Identification Reference System. However, the Supreme Court struck it down on July 23, 1998, in the notable case of Blas F. Ople v. Ruben D. Torres, et al.

Former Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno wrote the decision and even commended then Senator Ople in his effort to “prevent the shrinking of the right to privacy, which the revered Mr. Justice Brandeis considered as ‘the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men’.” In that petition, Ople prayed to invalidate Administrative Order 308 on “two important constitutional grounds, viz: one, it is a usurpation of the power of Congress to legislate, and two, it impermissibly intrudes our citizenry’s protected zone of privacy.” The Supreme Court granted the petition and declared AO 308 null and void for being unconstitutional.

What are these constitutional issues? First, the Supreme Court held that, “AO 308 involves a subject that is not appropriate to be covered by an administrative order.” Basically, Congress could have passed a law relative to the national ID system, instead of the President issuing an AO. Second, “because facially it violates the right to privacy.” Simply put, it breached the people’s zone of privacy, which is recognized and enshrined in several provisions of our Constitution.

On April 13, 2005, then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo issued Executive Order 420, requiring all government agencies and government-owned and-controlled corporations to streamline and harmonize their identification (ID) systems. Again, this was challenged by various groups and petitions were filed before the Supreme Court. Likewise, the same two issues were raised: first, it was a usurpation of legislative power by the President and; second, it infringes on the citizens’ right to privacy.

Collection of private data into one repository

A typical information Technology (IT)-based infrastructure for the NIDS would entail a central computerized database system, remote online access points and telecommunications facilities.

All of the data that would be provided by the citizens – name, address, birth date, civil status, (even biometrics data) etc. – would be stored in one huge repository, the central computerized database. This would be under the care of the PSA.

Various government agencies, for example the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), would then have their own remote access facility, normally a computer workstation. In the course of its daily operations the DFA would access the central computerized database online, query the same and check the authenticity of a passport applicant, download the personal information of the applicant, and make some data updates if necessary (say, passport number issued to the applicant). Over time, the central database would contain complete dossiers of each and every Filipino.

Considering that the government does not have its own national broadband network, most probably the remote access can be effected by using the existing commercial telecommunications facilities. This is where the danger lies. A commercial telecommunications facility is designed for public use. Couple this with inadequate network security on the part of the government agencies and you have a recipe for disaster.

With such vulnerabilities, it opens up the possibility that “would-be-hackers” might be interested in getting through the NDIS for their own personal gain.

Exposure of private data to the public

Will this centralized database of the NIDS be secured? Is there a risk that our private data will be exposed to the public? What are the technical and internal controls to prevent data leakage?

As I have mentioned in my other published articles, all information technology systems and computer devices can be compromised. No software application is perfectly written. Any software system would tend to have bugs, which could be exploited.

I said before that, “the reality is that the government does not have an established and effective security mechanism to protect its computer systems and communications networks from determined hackers.”

And I say it again now – the proposed NDIS is doable, but, in the hands of an incapable and technically clueless implementing government agency (probably together with their not sufficiently expert personnel), there is a great risk that the unsuspecting citizens’ private data would not only be exposed to the public, but be under the complete control of some unscrupulous individuals and politicians – putting our fundamental right to privacy at risk. The potential for misuse of our private data, collectively gathered through time, would always be there.

allinsight.manilatimes@gmail.com
www.facebook.com/All.Insight.Manila.Times

Yes to a national ID

A LITTLE more than a month before the May 9, 2016 national elections, hackers broke into the database of the Commission on Elections and dumped the personal data of millions of Filipino voters on the Internet. “ComeLeak,” as the biggest-ever private data leak in the country came to be known, was supposedly pulled off by homegrown hackers belonging to Anonymous Philippines and Lulzsec Pilipinas, in order to highlight the lack of security measures in place to protect the voters’ data collected by the Comelec.

Ultimately, the hackers dumped 340 gigabytes of purloined data online. This represented the personal information of most of the country’s 55 million registered voters, including those of 1.3 million Filipino overseas voters (complete with their passport data), 15.8 million sets of fingerprints and a list of candidates in all elections held since 2010, when automation of the electoral system was first implemented, according to the Web security outfit Trend Micro.

The Comelec quickly went on damage-control mode, saying that both its data and the elections had not been compromised by the cyber-attack. Two hackers – both of them young IT students – were arrested in Sampaloc, Manila and Muntinlupa by the National Bureau of Investigation shortly after the data dump was discovered, and that seemed to be the end of that.

The ComeLeak scandal was eventually buried by stories on the elections itself, as expected. Not a lot of people even remember it anymore.


But the cyber-attack on Comelec two years ago highlights the single most important concern being raised about the national ID system, which seems about ready to be rolled out nearly two decades after it was first proposed during the Ramos years. Can government be entrusted with our private data, which should never fall into the hands of malicious hackers and other people with criminal intent?

The question is important because unlike most personal data submitted online, registered voters and Filipinos who sign up for the national ID program do not do so voluntarily. Their data submissions are unlike those, say, of people applying for bank loans or credit cards or who go on social media or visit other Web sites, who give up private information willingly even if they know that it could end up with third parties that buy them from companies that collect and sell them.

The security of submitted data is about the only valid objection to the national ID system, which got a big boost after both chambers of Congress hammered out a common version of the proposed law on the scheme this week. The National Statistics Authority, as the repository of the data collected from the citizenry who will be given IDs, should make sure that it has learned from the sad experience of Comelec in 2016, in its bid to rationalize the chaotic system that we have at present.

If only because a unified ID system will provide relief and convenience to Filipinos who can’t access vital services without it, we should agree to the plan. And I don’t know of anyone who’s ever been asked to produce at least two government-issued ID cards or to submit a birth certificate to prove being born every time he or she renews one of the 30-plus mostly- redundant IDs issued by an equal number of government agencies will disagree.

* * *

Security concerns aside, all the other objections to the national ID system are unfounded, paranoid and just plain stupid. Take, for instance, the opposition by left-leaning groups to the scheme on the ground that it violates personal privacy.

This is fear-mongering that cannot outweigh the benefits of having a system that provides convenience to millions who suffer every time they have to transact business with government and private entities that require proper identification.

Nearly all well-run countries rely on some sort of unified ID system (say, the personal social security number in the United States) in order to provide services to the public. By itself, having such a system in place cannot constitute a violation of privacy, unless the data is illegally accessed or used.

Which leads me to another objection to the scheme that has been voiced by leftist Kabataan party-list Rep. Sarah Elago. This lawmaker said:

“This is additional ammunition for the Duterte administration, which likes to silence critics, trample on human rights and criminalize dissent. [The national ID system] may be used for spying and more surveillance.”

This is just the sort of outdated thinking that presumes bad faith and worse motives on a government that merely wants to make the delivery of services more efficient and effective. Besides, Elago, a Janey-come-lately-communist, forgets that all the totalitarian states that she and her leftist buddies are enamored with – assuming that they still exist, of course – were the most assiduous implementors of national ID systems, nationwide surveillance programs and oppressive campaigns to stifle human rights.

I guess Elago and other leftists are convinced that what few supporters they have remaining, particularly among the poorest, most underserved communities of the country, would rather have their right to privacy protected than be able to enjoy services like food and other subsidies, medical treatment, housing, education and documentation that they could get more easily from government with a national ID system.

Elago’s objection, of course, is part and parcel of the bigger campaign against President Rodrigo Duterte himself, who has promised to approve the Congress proposal as soon as it lands on his desk. As another rabid critic of Duterte’s, former Aquino administration official Etta Rosales, explained it, they really have no problem with a national ID scheme, except that it will be implemented by Duterte.

“Under more humane conditions where people are free to walk the streets and enjoy the comfort of police protection, I would say ‘yes’ because this facilitates government services to the public. But conditions [under Duterte]are not healthy and safe,” Rosales, a diehard Yellow, said.

All of which, of course, leads me to the familiar territory claimed by those hard-wired to oppose the current president. They can accept that Duterte is doing the right things, but they just don’t want him to succeed.

And this, ultimately, is the biggest reason why we should have a national ID system. It’s the right thing to do – and it irritates the hell out of those who think they have a monopoly of doing the right thing.

‘Show Dogs’ movie for the whole family

Fantasy film buffs will surely find Viva International Pictures and MVP Entertainment’s latest offering “Show Dogs” an exciting watch.

Directed by Raja Gosnell (“The Smurfs,” “Beverly Hills Chihuahua,” “Never Been Kissed,” “Home Alone 3”), the movie focuses on Max, a Rottweiler police dog who has to go undercover for a mission against animal traffickers. Much to his annoyance, he is partnered with Frank, an accomplished FBI agent who considers this assignment a little bit beneath him.

Max is voiced by actor and Grammy award-winning rap artist Ludacris. According to producer Deepak Nayar, “We needed somebody who has New York tough accent, so Ludacris is the one we wanted to play the tough dog.” Comedic actor Will Arnett plays Frank, a dog-lover in real life.

“Show Dogs” features the voices of Shaquille O’Neal as Karma, Stanley Tucci (“Devil Wears Prada”) as Philippe, Alan Cumming as Dante, Gabriel Iglesias as Sprinkles, and “American Idol” winner Jordin Sparks as Daisy, the love interest of Max. It also stars Natasha Lyonne (“American Pie”) as Mattie, a dog groomer tasked with assisting Frank and Max to blend into a show dog world.

A movie for the whole family that shows the value of trust and teamwork, “Show Dogs” promises to be “a tail you won’t forget.” It is now in cinemas nationwide.

• • •

Tidbits: Happy b-day greetings today, May 26, go to Comm. Fe Aldava Lim, Dr. Jo Catapang, Evelyn Recio Cruz, John Rex Tiu, Noemi Sandiko, Cely Cabalza, Iking Araneta, Nerissa dela Cruz, Brig. Gen. Raul Imperial, Karen Cabrera, Liza Rodriguez, and Josephine ElicanoMay 27: Mae Binauhan, Coney Reyes, Cherry Pie Picache, Gino Sotto, Michael de Vera, Col. Rody Tensuan, Lolita Camagun, Angie Duran, and Rufa Mae QuintoMay 28: Lupita Kashihawara, Edgar Aquino, Girlie Pleyto, Alice Marcelo, Mark Dayrit, Christian Jeirezze G. Martinez, Elijah Montealegre, Dr. Nancy Ordona, Rick Valenzuela, Jomar Bautista, Ali Uy, Joselita Sandigan, Edna Luzon,  and Zsa Zsa Padilla… Happy wedding anniversary to Aga and Charlene Muhlach, and Ronald and Agnes Manalili…Condolences to the family of Espie Bruno was 70 years old, who passed away last May 23…Get well soon to Annalyn Bautista… 

Friday, May 25, 2018

Editorial: Media woes

IT was very devastating to learn that broadcast giant ABS-CBN has terminated some of its employees due to network woes, which is redundancy.

Its local station in Bacolod laid off more than 20 regular workers and talents.

There are also reports that other stations from different provinces sacked their employees, too.

But in the City of Smiles, it was never a happy day for the affected media workers when they were informed about their separation on Tuesday, May 22.

Their employment is until June 30.

They will also get a substantial separation pay.

While the TV network has yet to issue a statement on the issue, this is really demoralizing news, perhaps callous.

One of the many media woes.

Media workers do not mind if they are underpaid and overworked, as long as they get the job done – that is to get the truth out there; to the public; to the listeners; to the viewers,; and to the readers.

It is a shame we have sitting president who will do everything to discredit the media, which had helped shaped our history.

President Rodrigo Duterte earlier threatened to block the renewal of ABS-CBN’s franchise, which will expire on March 30, 2020.

The president claimed that the network did not show his political ads during the 2016 campaign even if they already accepted the payment.

Last March, TV5 Network Inc. also shut down the operations of its online news portal, InterAksyon while some employees of CNN Philippines were also laid off in January.

This is just one of the many media woes. But still, we move on. Let us continue to seek for the truth.

Police state in the making? Groups alarmed over passage of PH ID system

Various groups expressed dismay over the recommendation of the bicameral conference committee of the House of Representatives and the Senate to proceed with the implementation of the National Identification (ID) system in the country.

The committee, on Tuesday evening, May 22 adopted the Senate version of the proposed Philippine Identification System Act of 2018, which was authored by Senator Panfilo Lacson.

The lawmakers are now eyeing to implement the law by the end of June this year.

ACT Teachers Representatives Antonio Tinio and France Castro said the measure will become a tool of the Duterte administration in “signing away the right of Filipinos to privacy and is another step closer for the Philippines to become a police state.”

In a statement they issued on Thursday, ACT Partylist said the national ID system mandates the establishment of a Filipino Identification System and requires all Filipino citizens to provide personal information to the government in exchange for the so-called Filipino ID Card.

“The bill empowers the government to collect and retain from each and every Filipino citizen their personal information of exceptional scope and interest,” Tinio pointed out.

He added that information that the government will gather from individuals will include not only the basic personal data but also sensitive personal information such as biometrics by facial scan, fingerprints and other identifiable features.

Tinio said the sensitive information will be included upon the crafting of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of the ID system law.

Castro said the bill is a threat to the right of privacy and will provide the government a powerful tool of surveillance, control, and repression over all citizens.

“With President Duterte’s emerging dictatorial rule, the deteriorating human rights situation, the increasing number of extrajudicial killings, martial law in Mindanao, a total war in the countryside, and the Duterte regime’s tyrannical rule, the bill may be used against those who criticize and oppose his policies,” she added.

The proposed law will also result to the deprivation of the basic social needs and discrimination against those who do not have the ID once the law is implemented, Tinio said.

Castro dismissed the claim that the ID system will provide easier access for the people to transact with the government.

She said delays in government transactions are caused by rampant corruption and red tape.

Tinio raised serious concerns about the country’s sovereignty and security when the ID system will push through.

“What is also alarming is that the proposed custodian of the giant database of sensitive personal information is the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) that entered into a questionable contract with a US-based firm called Unisys,” Tinio said.

A draconian measure

Human rights group Karapatan also condemned the passage of the National ID system at the bicameral committee of Congress, saying it is a “draconian” measure and should not be used to deny basic social services to all Filipinos.

In a statement on Thursday, the group said the proposed measure is designed to infringe on the citizens’ right to privacy, the right against surveillance and the right against government witch hunts against its so-called enemies and critics.

For its part, the the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) slammed the passage of the National ID system.

The group expressed fear that the law, once implemented, will turn out to be an additional ammunition in Duterte’s arsenal of tyrannical policies.

“The government wants to put a collar on every Filipino,” the KMP said in a statement on Thursday.

The group emphasized that progressive sectors and civil libertarians have long opposed and blocked the attempts of previous administrations to implement the National ID system.

“Now, under Duterte, all Marcosian policies are making a convenient resurrection,” KMP said. (davaotoday.com)

Thursday, May 24, 2018

#AweSM Weekend Party


Celebrate the #AweSM Weekend Party this May 25 to 27 by indulging in fun summer eats and dining deals at SM malls across the country, with exciting promos that celebrate the number 60, such as pay only P60, pay P60 less, or pay only 60%.

Lacson: National ID system in place by June

By HANNAH TORREGOZA

Senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson yesterday confirmed that the bicameral conference committee has approved the proposed law establishing a Philippine Identification System.

Lacson, chair of the Senate committee on public order and author and sponsor of the bill, said the House of Representatives agreed to adopt the Senate version “with minor amendments.”

The bicam approved the final version of the measure on Tuesday night.

“The House contingent just wanted to remove the word ‘foundational’ and ‘functional’. It has been removed. But the content, the substance, foundational pa rin,” Lacson told reporters in an interview.

“Remember that during our floor deliberations, there are only two important questions that need to be answered: Who are you? And are you who you claim to be?”

“So the other additional requirements are no longer important because after all, we have these functional IDs that can be used to back up your national ID,” he said.

The national ID will serve as legal proof of identity for multiple purposes and will be a non-transferable card containing the very basic demographic and biometric data of every Filipino citizen and resident alien.

Holders of a PhilID can present these in their transactions whether in government agencies and or private institutions.

“For example, when you go to a bank, or Pag-IBIG, or LTO (Land Transportation Office), all you have to do is show your ID and or your number. They can easily check either online or offline if you really are the one in the ID. So the transactions would be faster, whether it’s with government, public or private,” he added.

Once the enrolled bill has been ratified by both houses of Congress, the measure will immediately be transmitted to Malacañang for President Duterte’s approval.

“It must be signed within 30 days. If he does not sign it in 30 days, it will lapse into law. So, give or take by June end or before end of June, this is already a law,” he said.

Lacson said he hopes that President Duterte will report on the national ID law in his State of the Nation Address (SONA) set in the last Monday of July.

“I hope so. This is a landmark legislation. It’s been languishing in both Houses for 18 years. This was controversial during the time of then President Fidel V. Ramos because it was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional simply because it needs to be legislated and an executive order is insufficient,” the senator pointed out.

Bicam panel approves natl ID bill

The bicameral conference committee has approved the proposed Philippine Identification System (PhilSys) bill, which will allow the government to collect each individual’s demographic data and biometrics information, a lawmaker said on Thursday.

Rep. Alfredo Garbin of Ako Bicol party-list, a member of the bicameral panel that reconciled the House and Senate versions of the measure, noted that the bill is expected to be ratified this afternoon.

Under the bill, the government will be authorized to issue a card as well as collect and store demographic data of the public, including full name, sex, date of birth, blood type, address and status as to whether a person is a Filipino citizen or a resident alien.

The measure also authorizes the government to collect biometrics information, including individuals’ front facing photograph, full set of fingerprints, iris sen and other identifiable features as may be determined by the Implementing Rules and Regulations.

The collection of data on marital status, mobile number and email address, however, is optional.

“All the data that will be registered under the PhilSys will be absolutely confidential. Likewise, the issuance of any information without consent of the registered person has penal provisions,” Garbin pointed out.

In case of visual or physical impairment that renders the capturing of the biometrics information of the person impossible, biometrics exceptions will be allowed by the Philippine Statistics Authority.

Rep. Karlo Nograles of Davao City, chairman of the House appropriations panel, welcomed the passage of the National ID System.

“This new ID is designed to replace all other government-issued identification cards so that we would only have to carry just one card for all our transactions. This will save the cardholder and the government itself time and money from having to deal with multiple ID cards,” Nograles, who is eyeing a P2-billion budget for the measure, said in a statement.

“It is comforting that the government is on its way to enforcing a law that will augment our existing security mechanisms,” he added.

But for Rep. Arlene Brosas of Gabriela party-list, the PhilSys is a systematic attack on people’s freedom and privacy.

“This is a devious tactic to spy on critics and keep tabs on citizens. Threats to life and basic freedoms are real under status quo, and these threats are elevated several notches higher with the national ID [system],” Brosas said in a statement.

“Putting all of people’s information in one database puts everyone at risk. It will be lotto’s grand prize for online criminals and identity theft,” she added.

On top of a possible breach, the proposed ID system will exclude and disenfranchise marginalized sectors, including indigenous communities, which could have no means to register themselves under the system.

“The presence of [such system] will not answer people’s lack of access to services simply because the government continues to fail in providing these services in the first place,” Brosas said.

CCP celebrates 86th death anniversary of Huseng Batute

A special production by the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) titled “Pagbabalik Tanaw Sa Unang Hari Ng Balagtasan” commemorates the 86th death anniversary of Jose Corazon de Jesus. It’s on May 26 at the Huseng Batute Theater, a black box intended for experimental performances, which was named after the Filipino poet’s pen name Huseng Batute. CCP Pres. Nick Lizaso, a relative of the famous poet, said the event is free and open to the public.

Batute, who was born on Nov. 22, 1894, wrote his “Buhay Maynila” column in verse for the Taliba newspaper for 10 years. His poems were published in six books: “Mga Dahong Ginto,” “Gloria,” “Mga Itinapon Ng Kapalaran,” “Sa Dakong Silangan,” “Ilaw Sa Kapitbahay” and “Maruming Basahan.” He also penned lyrics for songs, most of which were kundimans. He translated the song “Nuestra Patria” into “Bayan Ko,” considered the second (unofficial) national anthem of the country.

Batute also excelled in performing in the “balagtasan,” named after Francisco Balagtas who also wrote “Florante At Laura” and “Orosman At Zafira.” It is a Filipino literary form of debate where rhymed verses were created in spontaneity under topics ranging from politics to culture.

“Pagbabalik Tanaw Sa Unang Hari Ng Balagtasan” is in cooperation with the Provincial Government of Bulacan. It will be hosted by awarded writer and performing artist Vim Nadera and Louise O. Lopez.

• • •

Sexier than ever

Jennylyn Mercado’s sexiness is in full view on Instagram, where she posted this photo taken on Balesin Island. Why, even her colleagues Mikee Quintos, Nar Cabico and Yasmien Kurdi couldn’t help but express their admiration. As of this writing, the photo has racked up 200,000 likes.

Jennylyn is one of the lead stars of the Kapuso Primetime series “The Cure” co-starring Tom Rodriguez. The character she plays wants to find out how someone gets infected even if he isn’t bitten by a zombie with the Monkey Virus Disease.

• • •

Tidbits: Happy b-day greetings today, May 24, go to Darren Espanto, Michael de Mesa, Mila Baylon, Susan Alonte, Susan Laudico, Ma. Lourdes Blanco, Ma. Victoria Aurelio, Sharon Samarista, and Susan Enriquez of GMA Network’s “Unang Hirit”…May 25: Ms. Beth Day Romulo, Tacloban Mayor Cristina Gonzalez-Romualdez, Alma Moreno, George Sison, Bechay Nakpil, France Bonnin, Bobbit Avila, Anessa Fiona Caalim, Willy Baranda, Loida Navarro Bernardez, Anita Magsaysay, Rosette Siongco, and Gelli de Belen

With Digong’s blessing ‘Bato’ will join politics

BUREAU of Corrections (BuCor) Director Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa has admitted he is inclined to joining politics.

In a chance interview at the Senate, Dela Rosa said he is 50% convinced about running for a position next elections.

“Nakaka-engganyo rin eh, tao lang tayo, tao ka lang naman, that’s normal na human instinct na matutuwa ka na merong tao o grupo ng mga tao na gustong patakbuhin ka. So ibig sabihin meron ka pang pwedeng ma-contribute,” said Dela Rosa.

The former Philippine Natiinal Police (PNP) chief added that his interest in joining politics was somehow influenced by unknown supporters, particularly those who put up the huge tarpaulin on EDSA egging him to seek public office.

But Dela Rosa stressed that the biggest encouragement to finally join the race will come from President Rodrigo Duterte.

“I am open to everything. I am open, sabihin ni Presidente na wag ka sa Senate, dun ka sa Davao Sur na mag-governor so dun ako, sabihin niya na wag ka tumakbo sa pulitika magtrabaho ka muna sa BuCor then tuloy tuloy ako kahit sa’n,” he said.

In case he ends up in the Senate, Dela Rosa wants to pass laws involving safety and security, including the reimposition of death penalty for illegal drug offenders, national ID system as well as doing away with prepaid cellphone use.

“Isang taon nang tinatanong sa akin eh,  dapat prepared ka nang sumagot baka naman sabihin nila (na)paka-bobo nitong, si Bato walang alam na gagawin sa Senado kung maging senador,” said Dela Rosa when asked why he already has plans if he becomes a lawmaker.

The government official further said that his family does not want him to join politics, but his final decision would still depend on the order of the President.

“Malaki utang na loob ko sa kanya (Pangulong Duterte), there’s no Bato without Digong,” he said.

Bicam approves PHL ID system bill

The bicameral conference committee approved Tuesday night the bill seeking to establish the Philippine Identification System.

Senator Panfilo Lacson said the bicam-approved version of the bill does not differ much from the version approved by the Senate.

"Not much difference. In fact substantially, the HOR (House of Representatives) adopted the Senate version," Lacson said in a text message to GMA News Online Wednesday.

He expressed hope that the reconciled version will be ratified by both Senate and House before Monday so it can be signed into law by President Rodrigo Duterte.

Malacañang welcomed the development.

"That’s good news! It’s a priority administration bill," presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said in a message to reporters.

Senate bill

The Senate-approved bill seeks to harmonize, integrate, and interconnect the countless and redundant government IDs, around 33, by establishing a single national identification system to be known as the Philippine Identification System or PhilSys.

Unlike policies in the past which were bereft of security measures, the proposed bill will plug the loopholes and provide better safeguards.

Under the bill, PhilSys will have three key components: the PhilSys Number or PSN, the PhilID, and the PhilSys Registry.

With a foundational ID, which shall serve as a legal proof of identity for multiple purposes, possibilities for more functions without the need for limitless data will be opened.

“The bill will allow every Filipino and resident alien of the country to be identified with the use of a PhilSys Number or PSN, a randomly generated, unique and permanent identification number which shall be the standard number assigned to each individual to be incorporated in all identification systems of government agencies,” Lacson earlier said.

The PhilID will be a non-transferable card containing on its face the PSN, full name, facial image, date of birth, address and fingerprints of the individual.

Under the proposed measure, the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) is mandated to act as the PhilSys Registry, a repository and custodian of all data including the PSN, registered records, and information of all persons registered in the PhilSys.

The bill also creates a PhilSys Policy and Coordination Council (PSPCC), with the mandate to formulate policies and guidelines to ensure effective coordination and implementation of the PhilSys.

Lacson said an important feature of this proposed legislation was the concept of authentication or the process of verifying, whether online or offline, the identity of an individual against the registry information in the PhilSys or PhilID. — with Virgil Lopez/RSJ, GMA News

Proposed ID system free from constitutional issues

By Ben Rosario

The bicameral panel tasked to fine-tune the Senate and House of Representatives versions of the proposed Filipino Identification System has assured the constitutionality of the measure.

Ako Bicol Party-list Rep. Alfredo Garbin, a member of the House contingent in the bicameral panel, said the consolidated version of the measure was approved Tuesday, with voting for ratification scheduled last night.

“We don’t see any problem with the constitutionality of the provisions in the bill,” Garbin said, saying that this the assurance of the panel.

He recalled that the national ID system that was implemented during the administration of former President Fidel V. Ramos was struck down by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional for containing budgetary provisions that did not pass Congress.

The bicameral panel agreed to adopt mostly the provisions in the Senate version but the Lower House provided the list of personal information to be that will have to be given by the applicant.

Under the approved bill, the following information shall be provided by the holder of the identification card: full name; sex, date of birth, place of birth, blood type, address and biometric information that will include photograph and full set of fingerprints.

Marital status and mobile or other contact numbers are optional information.

Applicants will undergo an iris scan which can be a vital replacement in case the holder loses or fails to bring the ID to transact government business.

The House version consolidated 19 different bills , including those authored by Reps. Arnolfo Teves Jr. (PDP-Laban, Negros Oriental); Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
(PDP-Laban, Pampanga); Maximo Rodriguez (PDP-Lban, Cagayan de Oro City); Gary Alejano (Magdalo Partylist); Rozzano Rufino Biazon (PDP-Laban, Paranaque City); Sol Aragones (NPC,Laguna) and Garbin.

The Filipino Identification System mandates all Filipino citizens, whether residing in the Philippines or abroad, to register personal data to be included in the National Identification Database System upon reaching 18 years old.

A national ID shall be issued the citizen and this will serve as the principal identification in dealing with government agencies.

The bill imposes stiff penalties of imprisonment and fine against persons found guilty of using false information or for procuring a card through fraud and utilizes it in legitimate transactions.

Garbin said the Philippine Statistics Administration will take the lead in promulgating the rules and regulations of the measure. It will coordinate with the National Privacy Commission, Department of Information and Communications Technology and other relevant government agencies.

Garbin said budget for the implementation of the national ID system may reach billions of pesos but will be proposed by the PSA.

Progressive solons slam bicam approval of national ID bill

Progressive lawmakers from the House of Representatives on Wednesday slammed the approval of the measure establishing an identification system that provides official national ID for all Filipinos on the bicameral level.

In a statement, ACT Teachers party-list Representative Antonio Tinio pointed out that the measure empowers the government to collect personal information of "exceptional scope and interest" from every Filipino.

"The information includes, not just the basic personal data, but also 'sensitive personal information,' including biometrics and other identifiable features of an individual that would be included later in the crafting of an implementing rules and regulations," he said.

Fellow ACT Teachers party-list Representative France Castro said the bill is a threat to the Filipinos' right to privacy and gives the government a powerful tool for surveillance, control and repression.

"With President Duterte's emerging dictatorial rule, the deteriorating human rights situation, the increasing number of extrajudicial killings, martial law in Mindanao, a total war in the countryside, and the Duterte regime's tyrannical rule, the bill may be used against those who criticize and oppose his policies," she said.

Tinio added that the measure will become a tool to deprive others who do not have it of basic social services, and discriminate against them.

"The bill will subject those who do not have an ID to a rigid identification and verification procedure that may hinder the person from getting the social services provided by the government," he said.

"With the tedious process and requirements needed to avail of this ID, there would be people who would not be able to process and afford the Philippine ID like the indigenous people and those in far flung areas," he added.

"We strongly oppose the passage of this legislative measure into law and we urge the public to do the same," Tinio said.

For her part, Kabataan party-list Representative Sarah Elago said the government should instead provide more funds for quality social services than for a national ID.

"The people's demand is better access to quality social services. What good is an ID, if there are not enough public hospitals, schools and facilities to cater our people who need these services the most," she said.

"Our public services have been deliberately made dysfunctional to justify privatization which makes these inaccessible and unaffordable to many poor and struggling middle class families," she added.

Following the approval on the bicameral level, the bill is now set to be signed by Duterte into law. —KBK, GMA News

National ID system approved in Bicam

THE bicameral conference committee has approved the proposed Philippine Identification System (PhilSys), which would allow the government to collect each individual’s demographic data and information via biometrics, a lawmaker said on Wednesday.

Rep. Alfredo Garbin of Ako Bicol party-list, a member of the bicameral panel, which reconciled the versions of the Senate and House of Representatives said the bill was expected to be ratified by Congress later in the day.

Under the measure, the government is mandated to collect and store demographic data of citizens like: full name, sex, date of birth, blood type, address and status as to whether a person is a Filipino citizen or a resident alien.

As for biometrics, a technological and scientific method of authenticating identities, the bill authorizes the government to collect photographs taken from the front, full set of fingerprints, iris scans, among others, as may be determined by the Implementing Rules and Regulations.


The collection of data on marital status, mobile number and email address, however, is optional.

“All the data that will be registered under the PhilSys will be absolutely confidential. Likewise, the issuance of any information without consent of the registered person has penal provisions,” Garbin said.

In case of visual or physical impairment that makes it impossible to capture information on biometrics, the Philippine Statistics Authority will allow exceptions.